1951 Humber Pullman vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1972 ZAZ 966 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1972 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1972 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1292 kg more than 1972 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Humber | ZAZ |
| Model | Pullman | 966 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 885 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2170 mm |
