1951 Humber Pullman vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1981 Zastava 132 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 937 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Humber | Zastava |
| Model | Pullman | 132 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2560 mm |
