1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 862 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Humber | Nissan |
| Model | Pullman | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
