1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2002 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2002 Skoda Superb is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Superb (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 572 kg more than 2002 Skoda Superb.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2002 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Humber | Skoda |
| Model | Pullman | Superb |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 19.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2810 mm |
