1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2005 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Smart ForTwo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1217 kg more than 2005 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2005 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Humber | Smart |
Model | Pullman | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 1820 mm |