1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 878 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Humber | Volkswagen |
Model | Pullman | Polo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 19.0:1 |
Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1154 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2410 mm |