1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 23 kg more than 1951 Humber Pullman.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1951 Humber Pullman has manual transmission. 1951 Humber Pullman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Pullman | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 2685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2700 mm |