1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 54 kg more than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Pullman | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2430 mm |