1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1951 Humber Pullman has manual transmission. 1951 Humber Pullman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Pullman | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 172 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |