1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 968 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Pullman | Etude |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1064 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2620 mm |
