1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2009 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 222 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio.

Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Humber Pullman 2009 Renault Clio
Make Humber Renault
Model Pullman Clio
Year Released 1951 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4085 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 111 HP
Engine RPM 3400 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 120 mm 80.5 mm
Top Speed 132 km/hour 190 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 8 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2032 kg 1810 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 2030 mm
Wheelbase Size 3330 mm 2580 mm