1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 771 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Colorado.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2010 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Humber | Chevrolet |
| Model | Pullman | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3210 mm |
