1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 284 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Humber | Cadillac |
| Model | Pullman | CTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2880 mm |
