1951 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 1951 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar C-Type | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Proton |
Model | C-Type | 300 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |