1951 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (200 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1951 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (298 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1951 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar C-Type | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | C-Type | Elan |
Year Released | 1951 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 186 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2270 mm |