1951 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 287 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. (298 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar C-Type | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | C-Type | Emme |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2770 mm |
