1951 Jaguar C-Type vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 307 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. (298 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jaguar C-Type. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1951 Jaguar C-Type has manual transmission. 1951 Jaguar C-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar C-Type | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C-Type | CLS |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |