1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1969 Triumph 1300 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar MK V (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 1300. (61 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar MK V should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 760 kg more than 1969 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar MK V | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | MK V | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3483 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 61 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2460 mm |
