1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 1994 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1994 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar MK V (104 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1994 Volkswagen Polo. (75 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar MK V should accelerate faster than 1994 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1951 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar MK V (244 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volkswagen Polo. (128 Nm). This means 1951 Jaguar MK V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar MK V | 1994 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
| Model | MK V | Polo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2410 mm |
