1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 224 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar MK V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar MK V | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | MK V | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3483 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2860 mm |
