1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (168 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1951 Jaguar MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar MK V | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MK V | E |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3483 cc | 2148 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2860 mm |