1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1951 Jaguar MK V.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar MK V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar MK V | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | MK V | XC60 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2748 mm |