1951 Jaguar Type-C vs. 1970 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1970 Lotus Elan is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar Type-C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar Type-C would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar Type-C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar Type-C (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1970 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar Type-C should accelerate faster than 1970 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar Type-C weights approximately 315 kg more than 1970 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar Type-C | 1970 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | Type-C | Elan |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
