1951 Jaguar Type-C vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar Type-C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar Type-C would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar Type-C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar Type-C (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar Type-C should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 577 kg more than 1951 Jaguar Type-C.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar Type-C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar Type-C (330 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm). This means 1951 Jaguar Type-C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar Type-C | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
Model | Type-C | Outback |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |