1951 Jaguar Type-C vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar Type-C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar Type-C would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar Type-C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Outback weights approximately 415 kg more than 1951 Jaguar Type-C.
Because 2008 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar Type-C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar Type-C (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Subaru Outback. (227 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1951 Jaguar Type-C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar Type-C | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
| Model | Type-C | Outback |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 227 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
