1951 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar XK | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
Model | XK | Outback |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2660 mm |