1951 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar XK.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar XK | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XK | ML |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 95 L |