1951 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar XK | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3010 mm |