1951 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar XK | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Matrix |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2601 mm |