1951 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jaguar XK | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | XK | R8 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 560 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1267 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2649 mm |