1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1974 Lada Riva
To start off, 1974 Lada Riva is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lada Riva (72 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lada Riva should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 53 kg more than 1974 Lada Riva.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Lada Riva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lada Riva. (96 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lada Riva.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1974 Lada Riva | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ3A | Riva |
Year Released | 1951 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1057 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2420 mm |