1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 1982 Volvo 260 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 260 (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 260 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ3A | 260 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |