1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (107 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 85 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ3A | Clio |
Year Released | 1951 | 1991 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 107 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |