1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1998 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1998 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (580 HP) has 521 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 60 kg more than 1998 Lotus GT 1.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Lotus GT 1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (391 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1998 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1998 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ3A | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 580 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2320 mm |