1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ (68 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+. (93 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ3A | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |