1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1999 Toyota MR-S
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR-S is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR-S (140 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR-S should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 140 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR-S.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Toyota MR-S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota MR-S (176 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota MR-S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 1999 Toyota MR-S | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ3A | MR-S |
Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |