1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2000 Nissan El Grand is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 860 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan El Grand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | CJ3A | El Grand |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
