1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2003 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Jeep | Seat |
| Model | CJ3A | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1035 kg |
