1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 928 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ3A | XC90 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |