1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 113 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 3 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1223 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |