1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | CJ3A | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2810 mm |
