1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (140 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
| Model | CJ3A | Polo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2520 mm |
