1951 Lancia Aurelia vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Lancia Aurelia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Lancia Aurelia would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1951 Lancia Aurelia. (75 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Lancia Aurelia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Lancia Aurelia | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
| Model | Aurelia | CTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 68 L |
