1951 Maserati A6G vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 112 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Maserati | Rover |
| Model | A6G | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1953 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1212 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
