1951 Maserati A6G vs. 1999 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Toyota Celica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Maserati A6G weights approximately 10 kg more than 1999 Toyota Celica.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 1999 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Maserati | Toyota |
| Model | A6G | Celica |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1953 cc | 1792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1090 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |
