1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 520 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1951 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1951 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Maserati A6G | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Maserati | Toyota |
Model | A6G | Mark II |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1953 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |