1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Maserati A6G weights approximately 360 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Maserati | MCC |
| Model | A6G | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1953 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1810 mm |
