1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2004 MCC ForFour is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 MCC ForFour. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Maserati A6G weights approximately 158 kg more than 2004 MCC ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MCC ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 2004 MCC ForFour | |
| Make | Maserati | MCC |
| Model | A6G | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1953 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 942 kg |
