1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1486 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2106 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2870 mm |
