1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (158 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 194 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Maserati | MCC |
| Model | A6G | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1987 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 744 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1810 mm |
